Tag Archive for Housing

Center for Housing Policy – Boise, Idaho

I previously summarized the Center for Housing Policy’s Paycheck to Paycheck report which reviewed housing affordability across 200 markets, with 1 being the most expensive and 200 being the least expensive.  My original post can be found here.  

The Center for Housing Policy collected data points from the National Homebuilders Association, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Salary.com

Below summarizes Boise, Idaho specific data:

  • Homeownership 3Q 2011 Median Price:  $148,000 (Metro Ranking of 104).  This places Boise in the middle of the data points of most to least expensive homeownership markets.  This includes new and existing sales.
  • Homeownership Affordability Index:  24 (Metro Ranking of 93).  This means 24 out of 74 occupations(or just 32%) earn enough to afford a median priced home as of 3Q 2011.
  • Rents of a 2 Bedroom Apartment 3Q 2011 Median Rent:  $702 (Metro Ranking of 164).
  • Rental Affordability Index:  52 (Metro Ranking of 154).  This means 52 out of 74 occupations (or 70%) earn enough to afford a 2 Bedroom apartment in Boise.
  • Qualifying Income needed to purchase a Median Priced Home:  $42,698 (Metro Ranking of 172).  In 4Q 2009 a similar study was done.  At that time the median priced home was $163,000, and the qualifying income was $48,657.  There has been a -12.25% decrease in qualifying income.

Here are a couple of additional graphics that I was able to extract from the website.

This Chart compares the income of seasonal retail jobs to the annual income needed to purchase a median priced home:

 

This Chart compares the income of five pre-selected occupations (out of a list of 74) to the annual income needed to purchase a median priced home:

 

One other tool that I haven’t shown allows you to select an occupation, and compare the median salary across three markets.  The report provides median home price, income needed to purchase a home, and the median salary for the occupation across all three markets.  The site can be found here.

 

    QH – Center for Housing Policy: 2011 Home Prices & Rents in 200 MSAs

    The Center for Housing Policy just released their 2011 Paycheck to Paycheck Report.  In the report, they detail:

    • How workers fare in the housing market (for sale and rental)
    • Housing affordability for working families in various occupations

    They also provide some templates on how certain occupations match up with the needed income to achieve the median home price in each MSA. The data points were collected from the National Homebuilders Association, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Salary.com

    The Most to Least Expensive Homeownership Markets can be found here.

    The Top 10 Most Expensive Homeownership Markets with Q3 2011 Prices are:

    1.  San Francisco, CA: $585,000
    2.  New York, NY: $450,000
    3.  San Jose, CA: $443,000
    4.  Honolulu, HI: $425,000
    5.  Santa Ana, CA: $405,000
    6.  Santa Cruz, CA: $395,000
    7.  Bridgeport, CT: $390,000
    8.  Suffolk-Nassau, NY: $378,000
    9.  Cambridge, MA: $370,000
    10. Ocean City, NJ: $353,000

    The Least 10 Expensive Homeownership Markets with Q3 2011 Prices are:

    200.  Battle Creek, MI: $85,000
    200.  Flint, MI: $85,000
    202.  Wheeling, WV: $84,000
    203.  Lima, OH: $83,000
    203.  Saginaw, MI: $83,000
    203.  Springfield, OH: $83,000
    206.  Bay City, MI: $82,000
    207.  Ocala, FL: $80,000
    207.  Toledo, OH: $80,000
    209.  Youngstown, OH: $77,000

    The Center for Housing Policy also reviewed data for rental affordability. They compared 2 Bedroom rentals across all markets. The Most to Least Expensive Rental Markets can be found here.

    Obviously, their are some market overlaps when you compare affordability of rentals to affordability of homeownership.

    Here are the Top 10 Most Expensive Rental markets (Cities in BOLD are also in the Top 10 Most Expensive Homeownership Markets):

    1.  San Francisco, CA: $1,833
    2.  Santa Cruz, CA: $1,730
    3.  Honolulu, HI: $1,702
    3.  San Jose, CA: $1,702
    5.  Suffolk-Nassau, NY: $1,661
    6.  Santa Ana, CA: $1,584
    7.  Oxnard, CA: $1,527
    8.  Los Angeles, CA: $1,465
    9.  Bethesda, MD: $1,461
    9.  Washington, DC: $1,461

    Top 10 – Where does your homebuying dollar go farthest?

    Where does your dollar go farthest when buying a home?  CNBC compiled a slide show based on data Zillow.com

    The data is summarized below:

    1.  Ocala, FL.  Value per sq. ft.:  $50.  Average home size:  1,615 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $85,200

    2.  Lakeland, FL.  Value per sq. ft.:  $52.  Average home size:  1,666 sq. ft. Zillow Home Value Index:  $89,100

    3.  Spartanburg, SC.  Value per sq. ft.:  $56.  Average home size:  1,678 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $98,800

    4.  Mobile, AL.  Value per sq. ft.:  $57.  Average home size:  1,803 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $78,200

    5.  Detroit, MI.  Value per sq. ft.:  $59.  Average home size:  1,604 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $72,900

    6.  (Tied) Atlanta, GA.  Value per sq. ft.:  $60.  Average home size:  2,128 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $109,700

    6.  (Tied) Memphis, TN.  Value per sq. ft.:  $60.  Average home size:  1,882 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $95,400

    8.  (Tied) Canton, OH.  Value per sq. ft.:  $61.  Average home size:  1,634 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $88,900

    8.  (Tied) Augusta, GA.  Value per sq. ft.:  $61.  Average home size:  1756 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $84,600

    10.  Toledo, OH.  Value per sq. ft.:  $62.  Average home size:  1,652 sq. ft.  Zillow Home Value Index:  $86,700

    Top 10 – Markets to Recover and Continue to Collapse

    Just think of this article as a comparison on the Good and the Bad.  In two articles in 24/7 Wall Street, writers Charles Stockdale and Michael Sauter respectively look at the housing markets poised to recover and those that will continue to struggle.

    Both articles based their research from Fiserv data.  Please note that these are their projections of what will happen over the next 18 months.

    Here’s a comparison map of both Recovery and Struggle:

    Road to Recovery – Charles Stockdale.  These are ranked by the expected percentage change in housing prices from 2011 Q2 to 2012 Q2

    1. Madera, CA:  15.5%
    2. Carson City, NV:   15.5%
    3. Yuma, AZ:  9.5%
    4. Yuba City, CA:  9.2%
    5. Farmington, NM:  8.3%
    6. St. George, UT:  7.9%
    7. Niles, MI:  7.5%
    8. Las Cruces, NM:  7.5%
    9. Syracuse, NY:  7.0%
    10. Mobile, AL:  6.2%

     

    Struggles Persist – Michael Sauter

    1. Naples, FL:  -18.6%
    2. Las Vegas, NV:  -15.9%
    3. Riverside, CA:  -14.8%
    4. Miami, FL:  -13.5%
    5. Salinas, CA:  -13.0%
    6. Cape Coral, FL:  -12.2%
    7. Crestview, FL:  -11.9%
    8. Orlando, FL:  -11.4%
    9. Bethesda, MD:  -11.3%
    10. Merced, CA:  -11.2%

    Florida continues to look bleak, and California is a mixed bag.